" />
Mobile

After a slight miscalculation Samsung doesn’t have to pay Apple $450,514,650

After a slight miscalculation Samsung doesn’t have to pay Apple $450,514,650
piers.scott@sociable.co'

One billion dollars – that’s how much Samsung was ordered to pay Apple back in August after a Californian jury found Samsung had infringed some of Apple’s patents. Except, according to a court ruling today, the jury made a slight miscalculation. A miscalculation to the tune of $450 million ($450,514,650 to be exact).

The court found that members of the jury over calculated the damages that should have been awarded to Apple when it was assessing whether Samsung had copied key features from Apple’s iPhone and iPad devices for its own Galaxy range of smartphones and tablets.

While the court re-assessed the damages it didn’t overturn the jury’s findings that Samsung had infringed some of Apple’s patents.

Samsung says that it is “pleased with the court’s decision”, although it is still required to pay Apple a significant sum.  With the new ruling Samsung still has to pay Apple over $599 million, although this probably won’t be the final figure.

Since nearly half of the jury’s award to Apple was struck out, a new jury will be tasked with deciding what Samsung should actually pay.  With a new trial being tasked with deciding the final figure the two companies will be back in court, which means more money will be going to lawyers and potentially more money passing to Apple.  Should Samsung choose to appeal the court’s ruling we could see the tab increasing even further.

Or, perhaps not.

Samsung is still pursuing its own legal efforts to get the case thrown out of court.  The company is arguing that Apple should not have been granted many of the patents in question.

So with half the award thrown out by the court and Samsung arguing to have the entire case dismissed we’re now approaching the second anniversary of Apple v Samsung with little sign that the two can come to some agreement.

View Comments (1)

1 Comment

  1. James Page

    March 3, 2013 at 12:17 AM

    Nothing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mobile
piers.scott@sociable.co'
@pdscott

Piers Dillon-Scott is co-editor of The Sociable and writes about stuff he finds. He likes technology, media, and using the Oxford comma (because it just makes sense).

More in Mobile

Visual Storytelling Platform Chronicles, Preserves Our Collective History

Tim HinchliffeMay 24, 2017
kids app

How understanding cultural differences allows kids’ app developers to boost ratings

Tim HinchliffeMay 10, 2017
streaming

The Kayak of Online Streaming Platforms With One Algorithm to Rule Them All

Tim HinchliffeApril 26, 2017
mobile payment

How to Keep up on Mobile Payment Security as Societies Go Cashless

Mehul RajputApril 20, 2017
apps

9 Incredible, Free Lifestyle Apps Of 2017

Clay WinowieckiApril 20, 2017
mobile gaming

Think You Know Mobile Gaming? Compare These 6 Trends From an Industry Expert

Keval PadiaApril 3, 2017
mobile app trends

7 Mobile App Development Trends That Are Happening Now

Alina KemMarch 27, 2017
cia iphone

CIA physically installed NightSkies tracking beacon in factory-fresh iPhones: Assange

Tim HinchliffeMarch 23, 2017
sharing economy

Paparide introduces Canadian collaborative transport platform to US sharing economy

Tim HinchliffeMarch 16, 2017