" />
Mobile

After a slight miscalculation Samsung doesn’t have to pay Apple $450,514,650

After a slight miscalculation Samsung doesn’t have to pay Apple $450,514,650
piers.scott@sociable.co'

One billion dollars – that’s how much Samsung was ordered to pay Apple back in August after a Californian jury found Samsung had infringed some of Apple’s patents. Except, according to a court ruling today, the jury made a slight miscalculation. A miscalculation to the tune of $450 million ($450,514,650 to be exact).

The court found that members of the jury over calculated the damages that should have been awarded to Apple when it was assessing whether Samsung had copied key features from Apple’s iPhone and iPad devices for its own Galaxy range of smartphones and tablets.

While the court re-assessed the damages it didn’t overturn the jury’s findings that Samsung had infringed some of Apple’s patents.

Samsung says that it is “pleased with the court’s decision”, although it is still required to pay Apple a significant sum.  With the new ruling Samsung still has to pay Apple over $599 million, although this probably won’t be the final figure.

Since nearly half of the jury’s award to Apple was struck out, a new jury will be tasked with deciding what Samsung should actually pay.  With a new trial being tasked with deciding the final figure the two companies will be back in court, which means more money will be going to lawyers and potentially more money passing to Apple.  Should Samsung choose to appeal the court’s ruling we could see the tab increasing even further.

Or, perhaps not.

Samsung is still pursuing its own legal efforts to get the case thrown out of court.  The company is arguing that Apple should not have been granted many of the patents in question.

So with half the award thrown out by the court and Samsung arguing to have the entire case dismissed we’re now approaching the second anniversary of Apple v Samsung with little sign that the two can come to some agreement.

View Comments (1)

1 Comment

  1. James Page

    March 3, 2013 at 12:17 AM

    Nothing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mobile
piers.scott@sociable.co'
@pdscott

Piers Dillon-Scott is co-editor of The Sociable and writes about stuff he finds. He likes technology, media, and using the Oxford comma (because it just makes sense).

More in Mobile

neobanks millennials

Neobanks are becoming more attractive to tech-savvy millennials

Ben AllenJuly 21, 2017
phone sidekick

Making Your Phone Your Ultimate Sidekick Wherever You Go

Ben AllenJuly 21, 2017
homelessness

Mobile developers are using code to help end youth homelessness

Tim HinchliffeJuly 6, 2017
augmented reality gps

Augmented Reality Comes to GPS Navigation, So No More Driving into Lakes!

Tim HinchliffeJune 29, 2017
mobile app development

How SMBs Can Add Value by Hacking Mobile App Development for Better Visibility

Tasha BronitskaJune 27, 2017
gay dating app

Transparent, secure gay dating app launches solution to catfishing that gets users Hookd

Tim HinchliffeJune 23, 2017
app features

5 Commonly Overlooked Features That Can Make or Break Your App’s Popularity

Vivek ShahJune 17, 2017
beautiful photos editor

Instagrammers Can Create, Share Aesthetically Beautiful Photos Like the Pros With All-in-one Editor

Tim HinchliffeJune 15, 2017
local coffee

Meet the platform looking to unite local coffee shop communities

Tim HinchliffeJune 8, 2017