Big Tech

‘Censorship guards the narrative at the expense of the truth’: Babylon Bee CEO to Congress

The Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon tells congress that online censorship guards the narrative at the expense of the truth.

Providing expert witness testimony today before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology during a hearing called “Preserving Free Speech and Reining in Big Tech Censorship,” Dillon testified that speech had become so restricted on social media platforms that comedy itself was becoming off-limits.

“Our speech is restricted to the point where we can’t even joke about the insane ideas that are being imposed on us from the top down” — Seth Dillon

“We learned the hard way that censorship guards the narrative, not the truth. In fact, it guards the narrative at the expense of the truth,” said Dillon.

“The comedian’s job is to poke holes in the popular narrative. If the popular narrative is off-limits, then comedy itself is off-limits.

“And that’s basically where we find ourselves today. Our speech is restricted to the point where we can’t even joke about the insane ideas that are being imposed on us from the top down,” he added.

“The most offensive comedy is harmless when compared with even the most well-intentioned censorship” — Seth Dillon

Previously, The Babylon Bee was locked out of Twitter for eight months for a satirical post made about Rachel Lavine, a transgender health health admiral in the current administration.

In his written testimony, Dillon remarked that “USA Today had named Levine ‘Woman of the Year’ — an insult to real women everywhere. So we fired back, in defense of women and sanity, with this satirical headline: ‘The Babylon Bee’s Man Of The Year is Rachel Levine.'”

When asked if he ever self-censored his own ideas or opinions on social media for fear of retaliation by the platforms, Dillon responded:

“In my view, self-censorship is doing the tyrant’s work for him, and so I refuse to censor myself.”

The Babylon Bee CEO went on to explain, “I say what I think, come what may. And that’s why when we [Babylon Bee] got locked out of Twitter, we were asked to delete that tweet [of Rachel Levine being satirically named ‘Man of the Year’], and we could get our account back if we deleted the tweet and admit that we engaged in hateful conduct, and I refused to do that, too.

“So, no. I don’t censor myself, and I refuse to delete tweets that they want me to delete for hateful conduct when I don’t think they’re hateful.”

Tuesday’s hearing also saw testimony from Twitter Files Contributor Michael Shellenberger, Stanford University Professor of Health Policy Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and George Washington University Law School Professor Spencer Overton.

Overton, for his part disagreed with the premise of the hearing.

Spencer Overton

“Private companies have a First Amendment right to exclude content as they see fit, and that they are not preventing ‘free speech’ or ‘censoring’ users when they engage in content moderation” — Spencer Overton

“This hearing’s framing, “Preserving Free Speech and Reining in Big Tech Censorship,” inaccurately presents the decisions of private platforms to ignore, de-amplify, flag, remove, or criticize certain content posted by users as censorship. In fact, such decisions are exactly what the First Amendment protects. Indeed, government attempts to threaten this right is censorship,” Overton submitted in his written testimony.

“Singling out so-called ‘Big Tech’ is moreover selective and misleading, as plenty of small companies have outsized influence on public discourse and cause serious harm,” he added.

According to Overton, “The larger point is that private companies have a First Amendment right to exclude content as they see fit, and that they are not preventing ‘free speech’ or ‘censoring’ users when they engage in content moderation.”

Tim Hinchliffe

The Sociable editor Tim Hinchliffe covers tech and society, with perspectives on public and private policies proposed by governments, unelected globalists, think tanks, big tech companies, defense departments, and intelligence agencies. Previously, Tim was a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa and an editor at Colombia Reports in South America. These days, he is only responsible for articles he writes and publishes in his own name. tim@sociable.co

Recent Posts

With surge in AI-generated code creates security concerns, DeepSources launches trio of autonomous AI agents for DevSecOps 

Autonomous, AI-powered employees are set to begin roaming corporate networks sooner than expected, marking the…

5 hours ago

As carcinogenic chemicals from cleaning products hit the headlines, Viking Pure Solutions is protecting employees from harm

Despite the ongoing fight to reduce, reuse and recycle plastics, when it comes to environmental…

5 hours ago

Muddy Waters vs. AppLovin: Why Investors Might Be the Real Target

Muddy Waters’ recent short report on AppLovin reads serious. Abuse, violations, an impending takedown. But…

22 hours ago

Trump’s Tariff Policy: An Apparent Double Standard for Apple?

Do you know how I knew that Trump would be the 47th President of the…

22 hours ago

These travel bloggers have the best tips on how to make the most of your trip to the UK

From Stonehenge to the Tower of London, Buckingham Palace to the Angel of North, there’s…

2 days ago

The science of what we eat: The NYU math grad bringing sustainable olive oil to your kitchen (Brains Byte Back Podcast)

When it comes to what we eat, more of us are asking the right questions:…

4 days ago