Categories: Social Media

The Simpsons’ Apu ‘debate’ pinches political correctness nerve

Over the weekend, Indiewire reported that The Simpsons would be quietly phasing out it’s most controversial character, Apu, causing the internet to stir in protest. However, the show’s executive producer, Al Jean, refuted the claim in a tweet, referencing the source of the leak: Adi Sankar, the producer of the Netflix anime series “Castlevania.”

Several months ago, Sankar solicited ideas from his Youtube subscribers, for an episode that “subverts [Apu], pivots him, writes him out, or evolves him,” he told Indiewire.

In the same interview, Sankar cited several unnamed sources who worked on the show that told him that Fox was considering dropping Apu altogether.

“They aren’t going to make a big deal out of it, or anything like that, but they’ll drop him altogether just to avoid the controversy,” Sankar said.

Despite Jean’s dismissal of Sankar’s claim, campaigns to #SaveApu surfaced on Twitter, reviving a long debate about political correctness and satire.

Apu has been an integral character on The Simpsons for over three decades. The catch phrase he uses to bid farewell to his customers, “Thank you, come again,” secured itself in 90s pop culture lingo making him as much a part of The Simpsons universe as his Kwik-E-Mart clientele; however, controversy lies in whether or not the character, voiced by Hank Azaria, a white man, plays into racist tropes.

Comedian Hari Kondablou addresses these questions head-on in his in his documentary, The Problem with Apu.

Perhaps what’s most interesting about the “debate” is that both sides of the argument about stereotypes in satire seem to fall in agreement that Apu should not be removed. The prime example of criticism of the alleged decision comes from Kondablou himself:

But even within the camp of the #SaveApu, people have very different reasons to keep him alive:

Until Fox explicitly denies that Apu has been wiped from The Simpsons, the debate will continue to wage on, moving away from whether or not the network should remove Apu, but what they should do with his character if they keep him.

Jordan Jones

Jordan T. Jones is a writer and social media editor who lives in Medellin, Colombia. He is interested in the diverse ways that society creates and responds to culture. The Atlanta-native is a Fulbright scholar, former associate editor at The Atlantic, and amateur salsa dancer.

View Comments

Recent Posts

Construction management software firm Billdr relaunches as AI-native operating system, raises $3.2M 

Billdr, a software company building an AI-native operating system for construction, announced today it will…

7 hours ago

Humanoid robots for sale in 2 years, AI smarter than all humanity collectively in 5: Musk to WEF

Humanoid robots will go on sale in two years, and in five years AI will…

3 days ago

Larry Fink promotes ‘A Spirit of Dialogue’ in Davos, WEF restricts replies on X

The WEF neither restored trust nor acted in a spirit of dialogue: perspective When Larry…

3 days ago

Satellites That Think for Themselves: How CATALYST Is Bringing Real-Time Image Processing to Orbit

For decades,satellites have had a simple job: take pictures, send them back to Earth, and…

4 days ago

Vikas Basra takes the helm at the only AI-powered engineering workbench for enterprise 

At the end of 2025, McKinsey published a summary of the biggest AI adoption trends…

4 days ago

The question isn’t whether AI will replace creativity, it’s how it will expand it (Brains Byte Back Podcast)

Will AI scale creativity or stifle it? A CEO’s take on AI and the future…

5 days ago