Web

FBI allowed to continue secretly obtaining your data from tech companies: court

The FBI will be allowed to continue issuing National Security Letters (NSLs) under nondisclosure laws according to a ruling by a San Francisco U.S. federal appeals court.

Content distribution firm CloudFlare and phone network operator CREDO Mobile appealed the case in an attempt to regain the right to inform customers of five NSLs they received between 2011 and 2013.

NSLs are subpoenas issued by the government which demand the disclosure of customer records, and can be sent to service providers without a warrant. They are usually sent with a gag order preventing the service provider from informing the target, or customer,  that their information is being accessed. It’s these gag orders which privacy advocates and major tech companies including Microsoft, Apple, and Twitter have been railing against.

Read More: Apple won’t comply with FBI to create a backdoor to iPhone security

Tens of thousands of NSLs are issued each year and the accompanying gag orders can be indefinite. The tech companies were represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation who sued the government on the basis that the gag orders violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution’s free speech protections.

The three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco unanimously sided with the lower court ruling. The next step would be to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, but EFF attorney Andrew Crocker said no decision has yet been made on next steps and went as far as to call the ruling disappointing.

Judge Sandra Ikuta said the gag orders meet a compelling U.S. government interest, are sufficiently narrow, and allow for appropriate judicial review. Ikuta pointed out that changes to the law passed by Congress in 2015 improved oversight of NSL use.

Lawmakers have recently made  attempts to expand the kinds of records NSLs can request. One such initiative only narrowly failed in the U.S. Senate last June. The expansion plans would have allowed the FBI to request senders and recipients of emails, some browser history and social media log-in data.

Read More: Propaganda Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: The Govt Infiltration of US Media

New transparency laws which have allowed companies to publish some NSLs in recent years have draw attention and scrutiny from privacy groups, who will undoubtedly continue to follow and combat the ensuing attempts to expand the subpoena’s power.

Ben Allen

Ben Allen is a traveller, a millennial and a Brit. He worked in the London startup world for a while but really prefers commenting on it than working in it. He has huge faith in the tech industry and enjoys talking and writing about the social issues inherent in its development.

Recent Posts

Horasis addresses global turbulence with assembly of influential leaders in São Paulo, Brazil this October

After many years of relative stability, it seems clear we are now in a period…

1 day ago

A cyberattack or software update could trigger a robot insurgency: RAND

A future cyberattack or software update could trigger a robot insurgency, according to a report…

1 day ago

Off the grid: the rise of mobile charging amidst the electric vehicle revolution

In its century-long history, the automotive industry has not undergone a revolution quite as significant…

1 day ago

As demand for energy booms, Think Power Solutions appoints Daniel Helman as Chief Executive Officer

Across the U.S., the power industry has seen a massive spike in capital investments. In…

1 day ago

Will AI take your job or just rewrite it? (Brains Byte Back Podcast)

The future of work is already here, and it's moving fast, particularly in the U.S.,…

1 day ago

This AI Copilot Doesn’t Wait for Prompts — It Thinks Like a Hacker

Hey HackerNoon, it’s Kuwguap again. A while back, I wrote about building RAWPA, my AI…

6 days ago