Web

FBI allowed to continue secretly obtaining your data from tech companies: court

The FBI will be allowed to continue issuing National Security Letters (NSLs) under nondisclosure laws according to a ruling by a San Francisco U.S. federal appeals court.

Content distribution firm CloudFlare and phone network operator CREDO Mobile appealed the case in an attempt to regain the right to inform customers of five NSLs they received between 2011 and 2013.

NSLs are subpoenas issued by the government which demand the disclosure of customer records, and can be sent to service providers without a warrant. They are usually sent with a gag order preventing the service provider from informing the target, or customer,  that their information is being accessed. It’s these gag orders which privacy advocates and major tech companies including Microsoft, Apple, and Twitter have been railing against.

Read More: Apple won’t comply with FBI to create a backdoor to iPhone security

Tens of thousands of NSLs are issued each year and the accompanying gag orders can be indefinite. The tech companies were represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation who sued the government on the basis that the gag orders violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution’s free speech protections.

The three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco unanimously sided with the lower court ruling. The next step would be to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, but EFF attorney Andrew Crocker said no decision has yet been made on next steps and went as far as to call the ruling disappointing.

Judge Sandra Ikuta said the gag orders meet a compelling U.S. government interest, are sufficiently narrow, and allow for appropriate judicial review. Ikuta pointed out that changes to the law passed by Congress in 2015 improved oversight of NSL use.

Lawmakers have recently made  attempts to expand the kinds of records NSLs can request. One such initiative only narrowly failed in the U.S. Senate last June. The expansion plans would have allowed the FBI to request senders and recipients of emails, some browser history and social media log-in data.

Read More: Propaganda Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: The Govt Infiltration of US Media

New transparency laws which have allowed companies to publish some NSLs in recent years have draw attention and scrutiny from privacy groups, who will undoubtedly continue to follow and combat the ensuing attempts to expand the subpoena’s power.

Ben Allen

Ben Allen is a traveller, a millennial and a Brit. He worked in the London startup world for a while but really prefers commenting on it than working in it. He has huge faith in the tech industry and enjoys talking and writing about the social issues inherent in its development.

Recent Posts

How Coca-Cola’s AI blueprint gives modern founders a massive edge

Coca-Cola is building AI agents – and it does not mean automating the can. The…

43 minutes ago

‘A digital pandemic is a plausible scenario’: ITU flagship report

The ITU digital pandemic scenario is like the sequel to Cyber Polygon -- prepping for…

4 days ago

One Way Summit returns to San Francisco with expanded format and star-studded speaker lineup 

One Way Ventures has announced the dates and lineup for the second edition of the…

6 days ago

AIM 2026 opens with Chris Schembra, Barbara Corcoran and Get Covered unpacking the apartment industry’s AI moment and more

Interest in the apartment industry is reaching fever pitch as author Chris Schembra, mogul Barbara…

1 week ago

Is LinkedIn Tracking Your Browser Activity? Here’s What’s Behind It

Let’s take a closer look at ‘Browsergate’: is LinkedIn really running the biggest corporate espionage…

1 week ago

Techstars Startup Weekend bets on Valencia as a next European startup launchpad

Valencia’s tech ecosystem is getting a big win this June 12-14 as Techstars Startup Weekend announces…

1 week ago