" />
Mobile

After a slight miscalculation Samsung doesn’t have to pay Apple $450,514,650

After a slight miscalculation Samsung doesn’t have to pay Apple $450,514,650

One billion dollars – that’s how much Samsung was ordered to pay Apple back in August after a Californian jury found Samsung had infringed some of Apple’s patents. Except, according to a court ruling today, the jury made a slight miscalculation. A miscalculation to the tune of $450 million ($450,514,650 to be exact).

The court found that members of the jury over calculated the damages that should have been awarded to Apple when it was assessing whether Samsung had copied key features from Apple’s iPhone and iPad devices for its own Galaxy range of smartphones and tablets.

While the court re-assessed the damages it didn’t overturn the jury’s findings that Samsung had infringed some of Apple’s patents.

Samsung says that it is “pleased with the court’s decision”, although it is still required to pay Apple a significant sum.  With the new ruling Samsung still has to pay Apple over $599 million, although this probably won’t be the final figure.

Since nearly half of the jury’s award to Apple was struck out, a new jury will be tasked with deciding what Samsung should actually pay.  With a new trial being tasked with deciding the final figure the two companies will be back in court, which means more money will be going to lawyers and potentially more money passing to Apple.  Should Samsung choose to appeal the court’s ruling we could see the tab increasing even further.

Or, perhaps not.

Samsung is still pursuing its own legal efforts to get the case thrown out of court.  The company is arguing that Apple should not have been granted many of the patents in question.

So with half the award thrown out by the court and Samsung arguing to have the entire case dismissed we’re now approaching the second anniversary of Apple v Samsung with little sign that the two can come to some agreement.

View Comments (1)

1 Comment

  1. James Page

    March 3, 2013 at 12:17 AM

    Nothing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mobile
@pdscott

Piers Dillon-Scott is co-editor of The Sociable and writes about stuff he finds. He likes technology, media, and using the Oxford comma (because it just makes sense).

More in Mobile

‘Uber for…’: the wide selection of On-Demand services thanks to the Sharing Economy

Sam Brake GuiaNovember 16, 2017
Non-Mobile Friendly

Why Your Non-Mobile Friendly Website is Costing You Money

John MasonNovember 13, 2017
online dating

M8 app looks to disrupt online dating by harnessing our inner-Cupids

Ben AllenNovember 8, 2017
texting walking law

Honolulu begins fining pedestrians for texting while walking

Peter AndringaOctober 25, 2017
behavior conditioning

Hacking your life with behavior conditioning tech

Sam Brake GuiaOctober 25, 2017
social media immigrants

US can now collect social media data on immigrants, citizens, and travelers

Tim HinchliffeOctober 23, 2017
emergency tech apps

Emergency tech: from 1666 to modern apps that save lives

Sam Brake GuiaOctober 11, 2017
app visually impaired

An app that describes the world for the visually impaired

Sam Brake GuiaSeptember 28, 2017

AI Tinder bot: because modern technology hasn’t made us lazy enough: review

Sam Brake GuiaSeptember 28, 2017