" />
Data Security

Private data collection: from Facebook apps to a generation of microchipped biohackers

Private data collection: from Facebook apps to a generation of microchipped biohackers

Personal data collection by government and corporate interests on social media is no big secret, yet millions of users worldwide continue to willingly give up personal information without ever thinking about the consequences. This could even include being microchipped.

Take the latest “Most Words Used” app that has been circulating Facebook the past week. This was an app that originated in Korea, and if you participated in this “light-hearted” social media experiment, you just joined 17 million others who gave away a treasure trove of information about you and your friends to unknown sources all over the globe.

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

Mark Twain

The most common reaction for people who have been duped is to say, “Oh well, I’ve got nothing to hide.” This sentiment not only expresses the apparent willingness to hand over private information, but it also reflects a certain psychological state that makes it easier each time for outside interests to invade and influence people’s private affairs.

This baby goose-stepping into the lives of individuals has enabled outside parties to collect a wealth of personal information. This is then being used for everything from corporations to systematically program your online viewing content to sell you crap you don’t need, or more sinisterly, for governments to spy on your personal conversations in the name of national security, or worse.

“The best way to take control over a people … is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions”

Adolf Hitler

Welcome to the new age of a microchipped population. Microchip implants in humans are no longer reserved for the future; they are happening now, and over 10,000 so-called “biohackers” have been lining-up to receive them.

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips, work much like key-cards and digital storage devices, and are being used for everything from opening doors with a wave of a hand to monitoring the overall health of an individual, such as cholesterol levels.

Microchipping humans has been hailed as the next step forward in biotechnology, and the next decade will be “about virtual reality, implants, and transhumanism,” according to TECH Insider.

If microchips can make our lives easier, what then could be the drawbacks? How could these chips be an invasion of privacy far more ludicrous than any Facebook app or ad-tracking device?

“Have you tried turning it off and on again?”

The IT Crowd

How many times have you or someone you know had the embarrassing moment in a store or restaurant and the card was declined? At least you can still pay with cash, right?

Apparently you won’t be able to pay in cash in the future if the banks have anything to say about it. The major banking corporations have already began inserting microchips into credit cards, but now they have the potential to claim a direct stake in microchipping the human population. Since the US FDA approved of chipping humans in 2004, all of your financial records could potentially be directly controlled from your RFID chip.

UK banking giant, Barclays, said it is “working with Hitachi, the Japanese technology firm, to develop a biometric reader that scans a finger and identifies unique vein patterns to access accounts, instead of using a password or PIN,” according to Reuters. This is not exactly microchipping, but it is of the same (forgive the pun) vein of biometrics.

“The world today has 6.8 billion people … Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

Bill Gates

In one of the most bold microchipping proposals, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation issued a grant of $11,316,324 to Microchips Biotech in January, 2014 “to develop a personal system that enables women to regulate their fertility.”

The birth control microchip has the capacity to hold almost 20 years worth of hormones to be released over time as a contraceptive.

According to TWCN Tech News, “A quantity of 30 micrograms of the stored hormones will be released daily into the body so that the ladies are safe and do not get pregnant. The release of hormones will be done by melting a part of solid hormonal stock using a small electric shock which won’t be noticed by humans.”

And where is this “small electric shock,” hormone-releasing birth control program being beta-launched? In developing countries located in India and Africa to “at risk” women. Why would Bill Gates want to control fertility rates in women of color in developing nations?

If the contraceptive microchip technology were to fall into the wrong hands, such as brutal governmental regimes, the potential for ethnic cleansing on a mass scale could be achieved within a generation.

The contraceptive chip is anticipated to hit the market in 2018.

“The microchip-based implant is truly at the intersection of digital technology … where compliance is critical to outcomes”

Michael Hayden, MD, PhD, Teva’s President of Global R&D and Chief Scientific Officer

Last June, Microchips Biotech announced a partnership with Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries “with the goal of enhancing clinical outcomes for patients on chronic drug therapies.”

According to Microchips Biotech’s website, “Microchips Biotech’s electronic device is made up of microchip arrays that can store hundreds of therapeutic doses of drug for periods ranging from months to years and releases each dose at precise times. The device can be programmed to release drug on a pre-determined schedule and will have wireless control features.”

The idea of having your medication doses regulated over the course of years from a microchip is alarming.

“If you want to keep a secret, you must also hide it from yourself.”

George Orwell, 1984

If you thought that a simple Facebook app was intrusive, or that chips containing your financial records were egregious, then there is nothing more personally invasive than a microchip that is dosing your body with drugs.

What happens when a drug is recalled, but you still have daily doses programmed? How can you know for certain who is giving you which drugs and for what purposes? What happens when a doctor makes a mistake and misdiagnoses, or the chip malfunctions and delivers a massive, fatal overdose?

We already know that private companies sell information to third parties. What would happen if someone had access to RFID records and could manipulate or hack the system?

There are far too many questions that need to be answered before a large-scale microchipping of a population takes place, and it is a question of whether or not governments and corporations have the right to place foreign objects into your body that track information and administer drugs without your permission.

But don’t worry. Everything will be just fine. After all, “You’ve got nothing to hide.”

 

View Comments (11)

11 Comments

  1. David Roberts

    November 26, 2015 at 5:58 PM

    There will soon come a time when we will be forced to take a microchip in order to buy and sell. Cash will disappear, as it already is in Sweden. They are slowly removing cash because nobody uses it anymore, except for criminals.

    Never take the chip!

  2. Pingback: Proposed social media legislation in terrorist backlash a major privacy concern – The Sociable

  3. Phyllis

    December 14, 2015 at 7:59 PM

    Nice post. I learn something tougher on various blogs everyday.
    It’ll often be stimulating to see material from different writers and practice something at their store.

  4. Pingback: Google developing touchless screen that you control with your fingers in mid-air – The Sociable

  5. mendaftar facebook

    February 3, 2016 at 11:55 AM

    Hello Tim..,may I re-publish this article in Indonesian? included a link to the original source

  6. Pingback: France gives Facebook 3 months to stop spying on non-users, FB agrees to comply – The Sociable

  7. Pingback: This VPN Router Lets You Browse Anonymously, Unlocks Geo-Restricted Sites

  8. Pingback: India's Ban on Paper Money, Cashless Societies, and the Loss of Freedom

  9. seo

    December 1, 2016 at 11:34 AM

    It’s awesome to pay a quick visit this web site and reading the
    views of all colleagues on the topic of this article,
    while I am also eager of getting experience.

  10. shopping

    December 9, 2016 at 4:23 AM

    It’s difficult to find experienced people in this
    particular subject, but you sound like you know what you’re
    talking about! Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Data Security
@TimHinchliffe

Tim Hinchliffe is a veteran journalist whose passions include writing about how technology impacts society and Artificial Intelligence. He prefers writing in-depth, interesting features that people actually want to read. Previously, he worked as a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa, and Colombia Reports in South America. tim@sociable.co

More in Data Security

Ethical Hacking

Modern cyber security: ethical hacking and bug bounties

Ben AllenAugust 3, 2017

Is ‘free’ cloud storage really risk-free?

Guest ContributorAugust 21, 2016
Forgery

How you can protect hacked mobile apps from forgery

Guest ContributorJuly 7, 2016
ZeroDB

Interview with MacLane Wilkison: co-Founder of ZeroDB securities for big data & cloud

Tim HinchliffeJune 23, 2016
Database Security

Improving database security: facts, stats & how-to

Guest ContributorJune 13, 2016

Open source database security gets a significant boost

Guest ContributorApril 12, 2016

What companies need to start doing to keep their customers safe from data theft

Guest ContributorMarch 8, 2016

Drone Wars: The battle between competing UAV applications

Tim HinchliffeMarch 2, 2016

Giving up the last stronghold: the IoT, ransomware and your home

Guest ContributorMarch 1, 2016