" />
Censorship

Are Facebook’s censorship policies politically motivated?

Are Facebook’s censorship policies politically motivated?

During a recent United Nations summit in New York, Mark Zuckerburg was put in the hot seat when German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, directly called him out about Facebook’s inaction over anti-immigration comments. 

Zuckerburg responded that his team “needed to do some work on the issue.”

Censorship on Facebook is nothing new, but the social media site’s stance on global issues has been unpredictable and at times confusing. In this article we will take a more in depth look into Facebook’s reaction about censorship of anti-immigration content, and then investigate FB’s stance on a number of controversial topical issues in the past.

Zuckerberg on the hotseat

Facebook is used by billions of people around the world as a means of keeping up to date with friends and family, posting photos, and sharing everything from instagrams of cute puppies and well-made cappuccinos, to personal opinions on trending issues.

However, while millions enjoy Facebook in a responsible and respectful manner, there will always be the minority who use social media as a means of sharing offensive content and harassing fellow users. Over the years, Facebook has initiated a number of functions which allow users to flag content which they deem offensive or inappropriate, but has also gone a step further, installing algorithms that censor content which could offend or insult users.

Since the beginning of this year, Europe has faced an unprecedented wave of asylum seekers fleeing war and persecution in Syria and other war-torn Middle-Eastern countries. While heartwarming acts of public welcome have taken place in Austria, Germany, and other central European countries, the flow of immigrants has also led to an ugly backlash of racist and xenophobic anti-refugee sentiments, often being shared publicly via leading social media sites.

As reported in the The Wall Street Journal, in the aftermath of Zuckerberg’s mic gaffe with German Chancellor Merkel, Facebook announced that it would work hand-in-hand with Germany’s Ministry of Justice, Internet service providers, and other social networks to combat hateful and xenophobic content being posted online.

According to Amar Toor from The Verge, Facebook also committed to helping fund organizations that track online hate speech, however the company fell short of saying it would change its policy on what types of content are considered offensive.

What is hateful and offensive?

According to Facebook’s community standards page, the rules are as follows:

“Facebook removes hate speech, which includes content that directly attacks people based on their:

  • race,
  • ethnicity,
  • national origin,
  • religious affiliation,
  • sexual orientation,
  • sex, gender or gender identity, or
  • serious disabilities or diseases.

Organizations and people dedicated to promoting hatred against these protected groups are not allowed a presence on Facebook. As with all of our standards, we rely on our community to report this content to us.”

This raises an interesting point. With more than 1.4 billion monthly active users worldwide, from all corners of the globe, and different backgrounds, religions, colors and creeds, how does Facebook decide what opinions are inappropriate and which are not?

Read More: Proposed social media legislation in terrorist backlash a major privacy concern

It is important to realize that as a private company, Facebook has total control over the content published on its platform, and can designate any content to be offensive or inappropriate. However, different countries, with different laws, religions, and values are likely to deem different topics, themes and comments as offensive, than people from other countries.

Under German law, public comments inciting violence against a particular group on religious or ethnic grounds are punishable by up to three years in prison while convicted Holocaust deniers face up to five years. For this reason, Facebook had a legally-founded reason for censoring any content which was in breach of Germany’s hate laws.

Facebook accepts petitions from governments around the globe about topics or themes which will face “content restrictions” aka censorship. According to the Government Request Report, Facebook restricted access to three items of content to comply with Brazilian court orders, 15 pieces of content to comply with Israeli laws, 3,624 pieces of content in Turkey and another 5,832 pieces of content in India, all under a variety of local censorship laws.

Discrepancies to the rule

Zuckerberg has come under fire in the past due to the preferential support of some groups, but a seemingly “blind eye” policy to situations in other countries.

In the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo shootings in Paris in January 2015, Zuckerberg posted on Facebook promising “a service where you can speak freely without fear of violence.” These comments led to an Internet backlash of people criticizing what they saw as “biased” Facebook censorship policies, in which attacks on western countries such as France were highlighted, but daily tragedies in the Middle East, Africa, or Latin America were ignored.

The issue also raised a number of questionable censorship issues imposed by Facebook themselves. The Internet is brimming with groups and pages dedicated to Facebook censorship deemed as unfair or irrational. Widely publicized cases include censorship of photos of mothers breastfeeding, a post by Pakistani actor Hamza Ali Abbasi that questioned the value of culturally insensitive and “insulting” content in the aftermath of Charlie Hebdo, and any criticism of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) economic agreement.

Stamping out the competition

In a more transparent, but equally ethically questionable censorship move, Facebook censors content and commentaries which are negative or scathing of Facebook itself, and is also known to censor content about competitors such as Tsu.co

Facebook blocks any link to Tsu.co on every platform it owns, including Facebook Messenger and photo sharing app Instagram. Facebook claims that the censorship is based on “spamming” by the social network competitor, and allegedly deleted more than 1 million Facebook posts that ever mentioned Tsu.co.

Facebook bows to Monsanto

While Facebook advocates the reporting and removal of hate speech from its platform, it also seems to have taken a political stance by censoring anything that goes against its interests, regardless of whether the content is offensive or not.

Another controversial censoring was reported when an article entitled “This New Bill Could Ban GMO Labeling for Good” was blocked from being shared on Facebook for “security measures.”

The issue of GMOs is a huge area of controversy and the biggest GMO advocate giant, Monsanto, has been under heavy scrutiny for its practices with reportedly cancer-causing herbicides.

The fact that Facebook would censor content that takes a stance against against a potential threat to personal health under the guise of security reasons begs the question, “Are Facebook’s censorship policies politically motivated? And if so, who benefits?”

 

View Comments (10)

10 Comments

  1. Pingback: Links 20/12/2015: OpenMandriva Server Version, Alpine 3.3.0 | Techrights

  2. Pingback: Facebook bows to Germany, censors anti-migrant speech in Europe – The Sociable

  3. burton.vail@inbox.com'

    Grazyna

    March 9, 2016 at 10:21 AM

    However, there is no reason to rush it right now.

  4. israel.wojcik@yahoo.de'

    girlswebchat.ru

    July 6, 2016 at 2:18 PM

    Some truly prime posts on this website, saved to my bookmarks.

  5. Pingback: Social Experiment Shows Pro-Israel Terrorism Bias - The Sociable

  6. carmonbrazenor@gmail.com'

    脱毛ラボ 神奈川

    July 16, 2016 at 10:42 PM

    おはよう。私は今月で28歳と9カ月になります。そして暑い日になりました。ですからすぐにでもむだ毛は脱毛したいですよね。近年では、全国に脱毛専門のエステサロンがいっくらでもあります。やりたいところは、人それぞれですが、特に多いのはワキです。私は、人気店の脱毛ラボで脱毛しています。そのおかげで、今はムダ毛がなくなっています。やはり家で処理するのとは、違います。脱毛ラボに行ってムダ毛をなくしたいです。でも、医療クリニックに通ったとしても怖いのが脱毛にかかる料金です。それについては、脱毛ラボに聞けばいいでしょう。それと気になるのが、いつまで通わないといけないのかです。僕はできれば、半年くらいですべて終わってくれるといいですけどね。まあ、これからの人はカウンセリングしてみましょう。

  7. nicki.mauro@gmail.com'

    即日融資カードローン

    July 17, 2016 at 9:23 PM

    審査の仕方は業者によって相違はありますが、希望の金額が10万円程度だと証明書も要らないほどですから借入はどこでも簡単です。けれども借入額が高くなったときですが、銀行の即日融資カードローンは、年利が低いゆえ審査は非常に難しいと言われています。WEBを見るととても楽に手続きができて、即日融資を受けられるとの書き方がされていますが、実質は銀行カードローンの審査はかなり厳しいものです。しかし低い利息を得るためには仕方のないことです。

  8. magdalena.dubose@gmail.com'

    Arnold

    July 27, 2016 at 6:27 AM

    whoah this weblog is great i like studying your posts.
    Stay up the good work! You understand, many people are hunting around for this info, you can help tnem greatly.

  9. Pingback: Facebook Reinstates Napalm Girl Photo After Censoring Historical Context

  10. lavonbrereton@gmail.com'

    lifestyle

    September 24, 2016 at 10:06 PM

    I know this web page presents quality depending articles or
    reviews and additional information, is there any other website which offers these data in quality?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Censorship

Penis Picassos: what to do about the growing problem of visual trolling

Guest ContributorFebruary 26, 2016

Indonesia bans gay emojis as govt quietly ‘weakens’ anti-corruption agency

Tim HinchliffeFebruary 19, 2016

7 Moroccan journalists on trial for advocating citizen journalism via smartphones

Tim HinchliffeJanuary 27, 2016

Facebook bows to Germany, censors anti-migrant speech in Europe

Tim HinchliffeJanuary 20, 2016