" />
Social Media

Facebook #hashtags – a victory for Google+ & a threat to your privacy

Facebook #hashtags – a victory for Google+ & a threat to your privacy
piers.scott@sociable.co'

Some people use it out of laziness others out of confusion but posting a hashtag on Facebook has, so far, been nothing more than a cause of annoyance to social media power users and fodder for trolls.  But this is likely to change this year when Facebook is expected to introduce Twitter-style hashtags to the site.

Since it was introduced on Twitter in 2007 the hashtag has become one of the site’s most identifiable features and a significant source of revenue. Twitter is expected to make over half a billion dollars in revenue this year and promoted tweets and promoted trending topics (including hashtags) will be the greatest source of this.

This is the third time that Twitter has influenced the design of Facebook. Back in 2009 Facebook began allowing users to @mention each other in their posts and comments.  This was a convention directly borrowed from Twitter and one which Facebook users have become used to since then.

Then in 2012 Facebook launched its “subscriber” feature, which allows one user to subscribe to the public updates of another.  In other words, Facebook borrowed Twitter’s follower system.  Indeed, last month Facebook renamed this service from subscribe to follow.

But Facebook’s introduction of the hashtag isn’t a victory for Twitter, nor an acknowledgement that the microblogging site is a significant competitor.  Rather it’s an admission that Google+ is becoming a larger source of competition for Facebook.

When Google+ went public in 2011 it launched with Twitter-like hashtags, @mentions, and non reciprocal following. This was more than just a decision from Google to borrow the best of Twitter and Facebook but a means to encourage users to post more public updates.  By launching with a hashtag feature Google+ was able to encourage users to post more public content, it established that the site was designed to allow users to talk to those outside of their immediate circle of friends and family.

Hashtags create communities around events (just look at the Saint Patrick’s Day hashtags on Twitter, #spf13, and Google+, #StPatricksDay). They encourage us to explore and to meet like-minded users and to talk more.

And this is what Facebook needs.  With the exception of photographs and videos most of the content we put on Facebook is either plain text comments or links to external sites. There’s little in the site that encourages us to explore. Sure, we talk to friends or have a look at what our ex-partners are doing but how does this help Facebook build stronger marketing profiles of us?  It doesn’t.

By releasing a hashtag system,Facebook hopes our visits will be longer, deeper, and more engaging (likes, comments, and shares).

The hashtags we create and the ones we click will become another signal of our preferences and likes, which Facebook could use to build better marketing profiles of us.

Facebook creates profiles on us based on the content that we engage with. And we’ve already seen that Facebook likes can correctly identify users’ “race, age, IQ, sexuality, personality, substance use and political views”. But since we are only able to engage with the content that our friends publish (and we can decide what to reveal/publish about ourselves) Facebook has a very limited pool from which to gather data.  By letting us link to, click on, and follow content from a greater pool of users via hashtags Facebook will have the ability to gather even more personal data about us.

So while the introduction of hashtags by Facebook will be an admission that the site is playing catch-up with Google+ and Twitter, it will likely be very helpful to Facebook’s advertising system.

View Comments (28)

28 Comments

  1. SueAxelrod

    March 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM

    RecruitMoore Fb yet again copying twitter. lol Not really worried about the privacy thing. I don’t post it if I want it to stay private.

    • RecruitMoore

      March 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM

      SueAxelrod True! I am concerned when the Facebook graph rolls out. I’m going to need to find a way to have my info completely blocked.

      • SueAxelrod

        March 18, 2013 at 2:18 PM

        RecruitMoore I haven’t looked into the graph thing at all yet. Too afraid to click on it. lol I want my personal details kept private!

    • Livefyre

      March 18, 2013 at 2:14 PM

      SueAxelrod True! I am concerned when the Facebook graph rolls out. I’m going to need to find a way to have my info completely blocked.

  2. SueAxelrod

    March 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM

    RecruitMoore Just read here that “Your privacy choices determine what’s searchable:” https://t.co/06VETXz5e85e8

    • RecruitMoore

      March 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM

      SueAxelrod still leery about it. I’m trying to find the recruiting article that I read recently on how recruiters can use it. Just too much

      • SueAxelrod

        March 18, 2013 at 2:33 PM

        RecruitMoore hmm, I am going to review my “likes” and unlike many, I think. Likewise, going to review my privacy settings.

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 2:33 PM

          SueAxelrod yep! I started unliking pages and began adding to a list instead. This way it won’t show up in my feed.

        • Livefyre

          March 18, 2013 at 2:33 PM

          SueAxelrod yep! I started unliking pages and began adding to a list instead. This way it won’t show up in my feed.

        • SueAxelrod

          March 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM

          RecruitMoore ugh, I have 900 likes??? #GotWorkToDo. lol

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM

          SueAxelrod omg! haha It’s so easy to click “like” on a page and before you know it, you’re at 1000! hehe

        • Livefyre

          March 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM

          SueAxelrod omg! haha It’s so easy to click “like” on a page and before you know it, you’re at 1000! hehe

        • SueAxelrod

          March 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM

          RecruitMoore well, I “like” tons of our actor friends on imdb and those stay. 🙂

        • Livefyre

          March 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM

          RecruitMoore well, I “like” tons of our actor friends on imdb and those stay. 🙂

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 3:03 PM

          SueAxelrod those are important!! 😉

        • SueAxelrod

          March 18, 2013 at 10:09 PM

          RecruitMoore I got rid of few hundred pages then changed privacy to only me for those I still like. Maybe I won’t come up in graph search?

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM

          SueAxelrod me too!!!

        • SueAxelrod

          March 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM

          RecruitMoore Did you change your privacy settings? I just went to your page and I can still see your likes.

        • Livefyre

          March 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM

          RecruitMoore Did you change your privacy settings? I just went to your page and I can still see your likes.

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM

          SueAxelrod no didn’t change the privacy settings on the likes yet but deleted quite a few pages. Going to do that next.

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM

          SueAxelrod okay, changed all settings except for Films/Movies. Can you see anything?

        • SueAxelrod

          March 18, 2013 at 10:43 PM

          RecruitMoore Nope, but I don’t see the films/movies either. Maybe I should change my settings on those, too (not that it seems to matter)

        • RecruitMoore

          March 18, 2013 at 10:48 PM

          SueAxelrod now I’m a ghost!! Lol not really

    • RecruitMoore

      March 18, 2013 at 2:29 PM

      SueAxelrod here’s the article: http://t.co/fb5ese0VUtVUt

    • Livefyre

      March 18, 2013 at 2:29 PM

      SueAxelrod here’s the article: http://t.co/fb5ese0VUtVUt

  3. SueAxelrod

    March 18, 2013 at 2:33 PM

    RecruitMoore And remove all apps not currently using.

  4. Livefyre

    March 18, 2013 at 2:33 PM

    RecruitMoore And remove all apps not currently using.

  5. mchanson714

    March 19, 2013 at 2:34 AM

    “IrekJanek: Facebook #hashtags – a victory for Google+ & a threat to your privacy-The Sociable http://t.co/9KEHp1XSM6SM6”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media
piers.scott@sociable.co'
@pdscott

Piers Dillon-Scott is co-editor of The Sociable and writes about stuff he finds. He likes technology, media, and using the Oxford comma (because it just makes sense).

More in Social Media

visual-content-social

How Visual Content Impacts Your Social Media Presence

Guest ContributorOctober 24, 2016
facebook at work

Slack partners with Salesforce just before launch of Facebook at Work

Tim HinchliffeSeptember 28, 2016
napalm girl

Facebook reinstates Napalm Girl photo after censoring its historical context

Tim HinchliffeSeptember 9, 2016
federal reserve

Why the hell did the Federal Reserve create a Facebook page? A troll’s paradise

Tim HinchliffeAugust 24, 2016
lifestage

Facebook’s Lifestage app for teens is ripe for untapped data collection

Tim HinchliffeAugust 22, 2016
chatbots

Trove Market sends in the chatbots for Ecommerce home goods platform

Tim HinchliffeJuly 27, 2016
south sudan

South Sudan: How 1 Facebook post may have sparked 26K exodus to Uganda

Tim HinchliffeJuly 23, 2016
blocking whatsapp

What’s up with blocking WhatsApp? Information control in Brazil, Turkey & Zimbabwe

Tim HinchliffeJuly 19, 2016
turkey coup

Turkey coup: to control social media is to influence the outcome

Tim HinchliffeJuly 16, 2016