" />
Social Media

Facebook to rely on unnamed third-party fact checkers for fake news

Facebook to rely on unnamed third-party fact checkers for fake news

Under scrutiny for being a platform that distributes so-called fake news, Facebook will rely on third-party fact checkers to determine if a story is a hoax.

In an announcement on Facebook today, Zuckerberg wrote, “Today we’re making it easier to report hoaxes, and if many people report a story, then we’ll send it to third-party fact checking organizations. If the fact checkers agree a story is a hoax, you’ll see a flag on the story saying it has been disputed, and that story may be less likely to show up in News Feed.”

The Facebook CEO also mentioned that “you’ll still be able to read and share the story, but you’ll now have more information about whether fact checkers believe it’s accurate. No one will be able to make a disputed story into an ad or promote it on our platform.”

While the third-party fact checkers were not actually named, they are reported to be “signatories of Poynter’s International Fact Checking Code of Principles,” according to Facebook’s official News Room.

The signatories include ABC News, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, and Snopes, among the 43 listed.

In 1983, there were about 50 companies that had a stake in the mainstream media. That number has now dwindled to about six.

It is reported that Comcast, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS control 90% of all the news in US. Comcast took over General Electric’s spot on the “Big 6” after mergers and acquisitions between NBC, GE, and Comcast.

With that type of consolidation, who is really determining which news is fake or real?

As so-called fake news is raising alarms by the mainstream media, these same mainstream publications are oftentimes equally as guilty in the area of being talking heads for lobbyists and governments.

Read More: Propaganda Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: The Govt Infiltration of US Media

One of the main difficulties of officially determining whether a story is a hoax or not, unfortunately, depends on belief rather fact. That is what makes Facebook’s third-party fact checkers controversial — they are not named specifically out of the list of 43 signatories.

In fact Poynter’s says “It is important to note that not all signatories of this code are a part of the Facebook pilot; in fact the majority are not.”

However, the prompt to reduce fake news from Facebook’s news feed shows that it is targeted at removing financial incentive from spammers, and not from hard-hitting stories that have the potential to sway elections.

“We’ve found that a lot of fake news is financially motivated. Spammers make money by masquerading as well-known news organizations, and posting hoaxes that get people to visit to their sites, which are often mostly ads. So we’re doing several things to reduce the financial incentives,” Facebook’s report states.

According to the report, “Stories that have been disputed may also appear lower in News Feed,” and “It will still be possible to share these stories, but you will see a warning that the story has been disputed as you share.”

While this looks like a positive attempt at reform, if a story is refuted enough (i.e. believed by enough people to be false), it will be harder to find, even if the story actually turns out to be true.

It’s a dangerous path to self-censorship, which carries the possibility of suppressing important information on the basis that too many people don’t agree with it, or Facebook’s unnamed fact checkers deem it a hoax.

View Comments (2)

2 Comments

  1. Pingback: Google, Facebook Control 99% of Ad growth; How Does this Affect Journalism?

  2. Pingback: The Better Angels of Tech Making Progress in the Face Controversy and Cynicism - The Sociable

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media
@TimHinchliffe

Tim Hinchliffe is a veteran journalist whose passions include writing about how technology impacts society and Artificial Intelligence. He prefers writing in-depth, interesting features that people actually want to read. Previously, he worked as a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa, and Colombia Reports in South America. tim@sociable.co

More in Social Media

Instagram Tweaks “Free Speech”, but for Money or for Progress? - The Sociable

Instagram tweaks “free speech”, but for money or progress?

Ben AllenAugust 18, 2017
facebook habits

The wall falls: how Facebook habits have changed with the times

Nicolas WaddellAugust 15, 2017
hate speech

E-communities are trying to redefine hate speech after Charlottesville incident

Omar ElorfalyAugust 15, 2017
From Dating to Sexting: The Stats Behind Technology’s Effect on Love Life

From dating to sexting: the stats behind technology’s effect on love life

Ben AllenAugust 11, 2017
social media content

Get Your Team Typing: How to Jumpstart a Social Media Content Machine

Craig CorbettJuly 28, 2017
at-risk youth

Researchers use social media to detect at-risk youth for self-inflicted harm

Omar ElorfalyJuly 25, 2017

Social Mapping Network Launches Human Atlas Using ‘Earth as a Platform’

Tim HinchliffeJuly 6, 2017
london attack

UK Secretary wants to use London attack as excuse to spy on WhatsApp

Tim HinchliffeMarch 27, 2017
optimize social media

3 Reasons You Need To Optimize Your Website For Social Media

Michael PeggsMarch 2, 2017